Cagoules

All rainwear discussions in general or that do not fit into other categories.
Nylon macs
Posts: 972
Joined: October 15th, 2022, 5:58 am
Location: Exeter Devon

Re: Cagoules

Post by Nylon macs »

rainwear-experience wrote: January 14th, 2023, 1:12 pm
Nylon macs wrote: January 14th, 2023, 6:49 am Very sexy ladys in there wonderful cagoules
Thanks for the nice comments I know models posing for money dosen't float everyones boat but I'm quite happy with it
I'm happy for theme if it's there job modeling .and enjoying wearing rainwear or whatever they wear.
They look amazing and there making a lot of people happy doing so.
Thanks again for sharing.
Looking forward to more of your lovely post
MrCagoule
Posts: 120
Joined: January 8th, 2023, 2:06 am
Location: East Sussex

Re: Cagoules

Post by MrCagoule »

Totally agree all round. Rainwear-experience's photos are great, the girls look gorgeous.
rainwear-experience
Posts: 3234
Joined: January 17th, 2010, 12:35 pm

Re: Cagoules

Post by rainwear-experience »

Thank you to everyone for their kind words

I'm happy just to be shooting what I want to and sharing it where I chose
annabell-cagoule
Posts: 925
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 1:19 pm
Location: Cotswolds
Contact:

Re: Cagoules

Post by annabell-cagoule »

Found this nice review, the sounds are wonderful! Shame they arent as shiny as I remember on the inside

https://youtu.be/FdEpjNnS1vI
Lets get swishy!
YKK
Posts: 50
Joined: March 27th, 2016, 6:33 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Cagoules

Post by YKK »

annabell-cagoule wrote: January 15th, 2023, 11:43 am Shame they arent as shiny as I remember on the inside
80's Patrick Cagoules == lovely.
I don't think the inside waterproofing was ever shiny. Being Polyurethane.
Most Peter Storm Cagoules used a similar waterproofing and also not super shiny.
Some exceptions though while Peter Storm fiddled about with the waterproofing. Like these:-
Image
Acrylic coating made for shiny waterproofing. The thicker the coating the better.
Nice shiny inside waterproofing does make a nice Cagoule.
But I still love Patrick and Peter Storm Cagoules.
Proper 100% Nylon. Very noisy and making no apologies because of that.
discoruss
Posts: 105
Joined: January 18th, 2010, 11:17 pm
Location: Worksop

Re: Cagoules

Post by discoruss »

annabell-cagoule wrote: January 15th, 2023, 11:43 am Found this nice review, the sounds are wonderful! Shame they arent as shiny as I remember on the inside

https://youtu.be/FdEpjNnS1vI
I've got 2 of these. The one in the video and another in the orignal Patrick colours turquoise, white and blue.

Look and sound lovely.
annabell-cagoule
Posts: 925
Joined: June 19th, 2012, 1:19 pm
Location: Cotswolds
Contact:

Re: Cagoules

Post by annabell-cagoule »

YKK wrote: January 15th, 2023, 2:42 pm
annabell-cagoule wrote: January 15th, 2023, 11:43 am Shame they arent as shiny as I remember on the inside
80's Patrick Cagoules == lovely.
I don't think the inside waterproofing was ever shiny. Being Polyurethane.
Most Peter Storm Cagoules used a similar waterproofing and also not super shiny.
Some exceptions though while Peter Storm fiddled about with the waterproofing. Like these:-
Image
Acrylic coating made for shiny waterproofing. The thicker the coating the better.
Nice shiny inside waterproofing does make a nice Cagoule.
But I still love Patrick and Peter Storm Cagoules.
Proper 100% Nylon. Very noisy and making no apologies because of that.
Now those are absolutely perfect!
Lets get swishy!
MrCagoule
Posts: 120
Joined: January 8th, 2023, 2:06 am
Location: East Sussex

Re: Cagoules

Post by MrCagoule »

annabell-cagoule wrote: January 15th, 2023, 10:49 pm
YKK wrote: January 15th, 2023, 2:42 pm
annabell-cagoule wrote: January 15th, 2023, 11:43 am Shame they arent as shiny as I remember on the inside
80's Patrick Cagoules == lovely.
I don't think the inside waterproofing was ever shiny. Being Polyurethane.
Most Peter Storm Cagoules used a similar waterproofing and also not super shiny.
Some exceptions though while Peter Storm fiddled about with the waterproofing. Like these:-
Image
Acrylic coating made for shiny waterproofing. The thicker the coating the better.
Nice shiny inside waterproofing does make a nice Cagoule.
But I still love Patrick and Peter Storm Cagoules.
Proper 100% Nylon. Very noisy and making no apologies because of that.
Now those are absolutely perfect!
I'm with Annabell. These are just right.
Anotherraincoat
Posts: 303
Joined: November 29th, 2016, 7:00 am

Re: Cagoules

Post by Anotherraincoat »

MrCagoule wrote: January 16th, 2023, 11:49 pm
annabell-cagoule wrote: January 15th, 2023, 10:49 pm
YKK wrote: January 15th, 2023, 2:42 pm

80's Patrick Cagoules == lovely.
I don't think the inside waterproofing was ever shiny. Being Polyurethane.
Most Peter Storm Cagoules used a similar waterproofing and also not super shiny.
Some exceptions though while Peter Storm fiddled about with the waterproofing. Like these:-
Image
Acrylic coating made for shiny waterproofing. The thicker the coating the better.
Nice shiny inside waterproofing does make a nice Cagoule.
But I still love Patrick and Peter Storm Cagoules.
Proper 100% Nylon. Very noisy and making no apologies because of that.
Now those are absolutely perfect!
I'm with Annabell. These are just right.
Absolutely wonderful, i west mine regularly
Anotherraincoat
Posts: 303
Joined: November 29th, 2016, 7:00 am

Re: Cagoules

Post by Anotherraincoat »

Anotherraincoat wrote: January 17th, 2023, 7:16 am
MrCagoule wrote: January 16th, 2023, 11:49 pm
annabell-cagoule wrote: January 15th, 2023, 10:49 pm

Now those are absolutely perfect!
I'm with Annabell. These are just right.
Absolutely wonderful, i wear mine regularly
Post Reply